On September 8, 2025, a shareholder of Nutex Health, Inc. (“Nutex”) filed a derivative action in the Southern District of Texas that places the No Surprises Act (“NSA”) squarely at the center of a corporate-governance fight.  Specifically, the complaint alleges that Nutex’s heavy reliance on the NSA’s independent dispute resolution

In a pair of recent back-to-back rulings, Federal district courts in Florida and New York have held that the No Surprises Act (“NSA”) does not permit providers to bring private causes of action to enforce Independent Dispute Resolution (“IDR”) awards issued under the NSA.  Following on the heels of earlier

[This blog post was originally published on Proskauer’s Social Responsibility and Pro Bono blog here.]

A Proskauer team, along with Disability Rights New York (DRNY), Children’s Rights (CR) and the National Health Law Program (NHeLP), reached a preliminary settlement agreement with the State of New York in C.K. v.

[This blog post was originally published on Proskauer’s Government Contractor Compliance & Regulatory Update blog here.]

The U.S. Department of Justice (the “DOJ”), Civil Division, has started issuing Civil Investigative Demands (“CIDs”) to federal contractors and grant recipients, seeking detailed information about their diversity, equity, and inclusion (“DEI”) practices. This move is part

On May 27, 2025, Blue Cross Blue Shield Healthcare Plan of Georgia (“BCBSGA”) sued several emergency physician groups and their billing agent, Halo MD, alleging abuse of the No Surprises Act’s (“NSA”) independent dispute resolution (“IDR”) process.  The complaint claims the providers submitted ineligible claims, made false attestations, and inundated

Last month, the United States Department of Justice (“DOJ”) issued its “Civil Division Enforcement Priorities” memorandum, memorializing a shift from its predecessor administration’s policy on gender‑affirming healthcare (“DOJ Memo”). The DOJ Memo portends a significant rise in government investigations and False Claim Act (“FCA”) liability for suppliers and providers

In a recently issued opinion, the Fifth Circuit has added yet another chapter to the growing debate over whether providers may seek judicial enforcement of Independent Dispute Resolution (“IDR”) awards issued under the No Surprises Act (“NSA”).  In a much-anticipated decision, the Fifth Circuit has held that the NSA does

The U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut has become the latest court to weigh in on whether Independent Dispute Resolution (“IDR”) awards issued under the No Surprises Act (“NSA”) are enforceable.  In a recent decision, the District Court has held that providers may sue to enforce arbitration

Over the past 3 years, as chronicled in several Proskauer alerts, an increasing number of states have sought to regulate physician practice management (“PPM”) and private equity transactions in the health care sector, including California, New York, Washington, and Illinois.

The regulation of health care transactions remains an evolving

The Department of Justice’s (“DOJ”) May 19, 2025 “Civil Rights Fraud Initiative” memorandum, issued by Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche (the “Initiative”), marks a consequential policy shift for False Claims Act (“FCA”) enforcement. The Initiative instructs every U.S. Attorney’s Office to “aggressively pursue” compliance with federal civil rights laws, as those laws have been interpreted by the Supreme Court under the 2023 Harvard admissions decision. The effect of this order is to treat a recipient’s knowing violation of federal civil rights laws as a “false claim” whenever that recipient has certified, impliedly or expressly, that it would comply with those laws as a condition of receiving federal dollars.