[This blog post was originally published on Proskauer’s Government Contractor Compliance & Regulatory Update blog here.]

The U.S. Department of Justice (the “DOJ”), Civil Division, has started issuing Civil Investigative Demands (“CIDs”) to federal contractors and grant recipients, seeking detailed information about their diversity, equity, and inclusion (“DEI”) practices. This move is part of the DOJ’s recently launched Civil Rights Fraud Initiative, which aims to enforce compliance with federal civil rights laws through the False Claims Act (“FCA”).

Background

As we previously reported, the DOJ’s Civil Rights Fraud Initiative seeks to use the FCA “to investigate and, as appropriate, pursue claims against any recipient of federal funds that knowingly violates federal civil rights laws” – including Title IV, Title VI, and Title IX, of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 – and falsely certifies their compliance with such laws.

The Civil Rights Fraud Initiative builds on Executive Order 14173, “Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity” Executive Order (the “Order”), which, among other things, requires federal agencies to include provisions in every federal contract or grant award requiring the contractor or grant recipient (1) to agree that compliance with federal anti-discrimination laws is material to the government’s decision to pay the contractor for purposes of the FCA; and (2) to certify that it does not operate any programs promoting DEI that violates any applicable federal anti-discrimination laws. The Administration has been issuing contract modifications incorporating these provisions which, as we discussed in a prior post, create heightened enforcement risks for contractors. 

More Details

A CID is an investigative tool that allows the DOJ to demand information and documents in the form of interrogatories, requests for production, and deposition testimony “relevant to a false claims law investigation” before the DOJ has formally brought an FCA action against the contractor or as part of an investigation brought by a whistleblower pursuant to the qui tam provisions of the FCA. Once an FCA action has been commenced in federal district court, however, the DOJ must use traditional litigation tools—viz. discovery.

Federal contractors and grant recipients that receive a CID relating to DEI are advised to promptly notify their legal counsel to prepare a response. In addition, in light of the potential FCA enforcement risks, all recipients of federal funds should conduct periodic privileged reviews of their DEI policies and practices to ensure compliance with applicable federal anti-discrimination laws.

We will continue to monitor and report on the DOJ’s enforcement efforts here.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Guy Brenner Guy Brenner

Guy Brenner is a partner in the Labor & Employment Law Department and leads the Firm’s Washington, D.C. Labor & Employment practice. He is head of the Government Contractor Compliance Group, co-head of the Counseling, Training & Pay Equity Group and a member…

Guy Brenner is a partner in the Labor & Employment Law Department and leads the Firm’s Washington, D.C. Labor & Employment practice. He is head of the Government Contractor Compliance Group, co-head of the Counseling, Training & Pay Equity Group and a member of the Restrictive Covenants, Trade Secrets & Unfair Competition Group. He has extensive experience representing employers in both single-plaintiff and class action matters, as well as in arbitration proceedings. He also regularly assists federal government contractors with the many special employment-related compliance challenges they face.

Guy represents employers in all aspects of employment and labor litigation and counseling, with an emphasis on non-compete and trade secrets issues, medical and disability leave matters, employee/independent contractor classification issues, and the investigation and litigation of whistleblower claims. He assists employers in negotiating and drafting executive agreements and employee mobility agreements, including non-competition, non-solicit and non-disclosure agreements, and also conducts and supervises internal investigations. He also regularly advises clients on pay equity matters, including privileged pay equity analyses.

Guy advises federal government contractors and subcontractors all aspects of Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP) regulations and requirements, including preparing affirmative action plans, responding to desk audits, and managing on-site audits.

Guy is a former clerk to Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly of the US District Court of the District of Columbia.

Photo of Olympia Karageorgiou Olympia Karageorgiou

Olympia Karageorgiou is an associate in the Labor Department and a member of the Employment Litigation & Arbitration Group.

During her time at Proskauer, Olympia has focused on a wide range of employment matters, including employment discrimination litigation, due diligence, and policies, handbooks…

Olympia Karageorgiou is an associate in the Labor Department and a member of the Employment Litigation & Arbitration Group.

During her time at Proskauer, Olympia has focused on a wide range of employment matters, including employment discrimination litigation, due diligence, and policies, handbooks and training, among others. Olympia has gained experience across a wide variety of industries including financial services, education, sports, and media and entertainment.

Olympia earned her J.D. from Yale Law School, where she was co-director of the Clinical Student Board and a member of the Reentry Clinic. While at Yale, she was also Academic Development co-chair of the Yale Black Law Students Association and served as a director of the Rebellious Lawyering Conference.

Prior to law school, Olympia was an AmeriCorps member in Dallas, Texas, focusing on issues related to education and social equity.

Photo of Matthew J. Westbrook Matthew J. Westbrook

Matt Westbrook is a senior counsel in the Corporate Department and a member of the Health Care Group. His practice focuses on providing regulatory compliance advice for the Firm’s health care clients, including service providers, health plans, operators, investors, and lenders, among others.

Matt Westbrook is a senior counsel in the Corporate Department and a member of the Health Care Group. His practice focuses on providing regulatory compliance advice for the Firm’s health care clients, including service providers, health plans, operators, investors, and lenders, among others. Matt specifically provides advice on fraud and abuse matters arising under the Federal False Claims Act (FCA), Civil Monetary Penalties Law, Federal Anti-Kickback Statute (AKS), and Physician Self-Referral Law (Stark Law), as well as on the regulations promulgated by the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) and the Department of Health and Human Services, including the Office of Inspector General (OIG), Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), and Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

Before joining the Firm, Matt served as senior counsel in OIG’s Administrative and Civil Remedies Branch. At OIG, Matt was responsible for determining whether to impose administrative sanctions, including civil money penalties and Federal health care program exclusions, against health care providers and suppliers, and whether to impose civil money penalties on hospitals and physicians in connection with matters referred to CMS under the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA). During his tenure, Matt also litigated exclusion appeals before administrative law judges and appellate panels of the Departmental Appeals Board; advised United States Attorney’s Offices on exclusions appealed to Federal district courts; resolved voluntary self-disclosures submitted by providers and grant and contract recipients; and participated in the negotiations and settlements of FCA matters by the Department of Justice involving the AKS, Stark Law, CMS reimbursement issues, and DEA and FDA compliance issues. In connection with certain FCA resolutions, Matt also negotiated and monitored corporate integrity agreements.

On the Florida junior circuit and in college, Matt was a competitive tennis player. Matt played on the varsity team and was captain his senior year at Rhodes College, earning ITA Division III and SCAC All-Academic Honor Roll awards his sophomore, junior, and senior years. Matt is an active member of the American Health Law Association (AHLA) and currently serves as a Vice Chair of AHLA’s Fraud and Abuse Practice Group.

Articles:

Matthew J. Westbrook and David M. Blank, “Using OIG’s Cross-Component Audit and Enforcement Data to Strengthen Your Compliance Program,” Compliance Today (February 2024).

Ed Kornreich, Matthew Westbrook, and Angela Gichinga, “Bracing for the Impact of the No Surprises Act,” Westlaw Today (June 16, 2022).

Presentations:

Bill Mathias and Matt Westbrook, “‘Lightning Round’:  A Fraud & Abuse Due Diligence Game Show,” American Health Law Association (Health Care Transactions Conference, May 5–6, 2025).

Matthew J. Westbrook and David M. Blank, “Recent Trends in CMPL Enforcement, American Health Law Association (Webinar, May 24, 2023).